Orchan Consulting | Asia Sdn Bhd

 “Thought leadership” has become one of those overused buzzwords that’s lost all meaning. Every other LinkedIn post promises some grand new vision, some “future of X” prediction, some executive announcing that they too have Deep Thoughts about the state of the world. The result? A mountain of ego-driven fluff no one asked for, and no one remembers. Thought leadership without usefulness is just self-promotion. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: people don’t care about your thoughts . They care about their problems. And the leaders who actually stand out aren’t the ones shouting, “Look at my insight!” but the ones consistently saying, “Here’s something useful you can apply right now.” Think about it: A CEO who publishes a checklist to help SMEs cut energy costs earns far more trust than one who writes 1,500 words about “the coming green economy.” A communications director who shares three phrases to avoid in a crisis briefing will be remembered long after the “Top 10 PR Tren...

Headlines don’t prove ROI. Discover why media coverage is a vanity metric, and how to measure communication by real impact: trust, behaviour, and outcomes. Agencies love to brag about “media coverage.” The number of headlines. The stack of clippings. The glossy PDF full of logos. But here’s the truth: media coverage without impact is just wallpaper. It looks nice, but it doesn’t fill the room. If your audience doesn’t think differently, feel differently, or act differently, all you’ve got is noise. Coverage vs. Impact: The Real Difference Coverage = visibility. Did the story run? Was the brand mentioned? Impact = outcomes. Did people shift their thinking, trust more, or act differently because of that story? One gets you attention. The other moves your business forward. Why Counting Headlines is a Vanity Metric No one remembers logos on a PDF. What people remember is how a story made them think differently. Volume doesn’t equal influence. Ten tiny pickups in ...