Orchan Consulting | Asia Sdn Bhd

When crisis hits in Asia-Pacific, speed and nuance decide whether a brand sinks or swims. Social media storms in Jakarta. Regulatory crackdowns in Singapore. Consumer backlash in Bangkok. It’s a volatile region where reputations are built -- or shredded -- in hours, not weeks. And now AI is in the mix. Tools that can scan sentiment in real time, predict reputational flashpoints, or even draft holding statements are reshaping how brands respond. But here’s the kicker: AI doesn’t replace crisis communications. It simply raises the stakes. Brands that misuse it risk amplifying the very chaos they’re trying to contain. So, what lessons can we take from APAC brands already navigating this AI-crisis intersection? Lesson 1: Speed Is Useless Without Context AI excels at velocity. It can monitor thousands of conversations across Twitter/X, TikTok, WeChat, WhatsApp and niche local platforms like Line or Koo. But speed without cultural context is dangerous. Take an example from a consumer e...

A few years ago, a regional brand we worked with found itself in the middle of a fast-moving online storm. A minor service error had escalated into angry tweets, then media pick-up. Their instinct? “Let’s wait it out. If we don’t feed the fire, it’ll burn out.” But silence doesn’t look neutral. In today’s environment, silence looks like guilt. Within 48 hours, the narrative was out of their hands. By the time they finally issued a statement, the damage wasn’t just about the service error -- it was about “a company that doesn’t care.” This isn’t a one-off. We’ve seen it across industries in Asia-Pacific : brands that equate silence with safety almost always dig themselves deeper . The public doesn’t interpret silence as strategic restraint ; they interpret it as evasion . And competitors or activists will happily fill that vacuum with their own version of the story. The lesson is clear: crisis management is not about hiding; it’s about speaking quickly without losing control . That’...

Most crisis management plans fail the moment reality hits. Here’s why your playbook is probably useless - and what actually works when reputation is on the line. Crisis management plans look great on paper. Thick binders. Colour-coded tabs. Executive signatures on the front page. But when the fire alarm goes off? Most of those plans are about as useful as duit pisang. Here’s the uncomfortable truth: the majority of crisis plans fail the second they’re needed. Not because people don’t mean well, but because the plans are written for boardrooms, not for the chaos of real life. The Big Flaws We See Over and Over 1. Too Slow to Matter Plans are often thick binders or pretty PDFs that require endless approvals before anyone can act. By the time the press statement is “perfected,” the damage is already viral. 2. Too Sanitised to Be Believed Crisis templates are full of jargon and corporate-safe language. But in a real crisis, audiences crave honesty , not clichés. If your response...

Crisis doesn’t knock politely. It barges in. One minute you’re trending for a clever campaign, the next you’re trending for all the wrong reasons. In Malaysia, where culture, community, and the court of public opinion move fast (and sometimes unforgivingly), managing a crisis is about more than issuing a statement. It’s about protecting trust when it matters most. So What Counts as a Crisis Today? In Malaysia, a “crisis” isn’t just a product recall or a shareholder scandal. These days it can be: A social media pile-on that starts with one unhappy customer. A regulatory slip-up that attracts headlines and ministry eyes. A cultural misstep that sparks outrage faster than you can say “delete tweet.”                                           Just look at the recent myBurgerLab incident (link below): a senior exec’s careless remark about Friday prayers didn’t just stay on Facebook; i...