Posts

AI in Crisis Communications: What Boards in Regulated Sectors Need to Know

-
Image
The Board-Level Reality Crises in Asia-Pacific can escalate rapidly, but outcomes depend on a mix of market dynamics, regulatory frameworks, cultural norms, and public expectations. AI is increasingly embedded in crisis response, offering speed and insights, but its effects are neither uniform nor guaranteed. For instance, a product recall in Thailand may escalate differently than a regulatory alert in Singapore due to local media dynamics and social norms. Boards should recognise that AI can accelerate response, but its reliability varies by context. Governance, human judgement, and situational awareness remain critical. Bottom line: AI can inform action. Boards ensure that speed does not compromise trust, compliance, or enterprise value. What AI Can Do (with Caveats) AI can strengthen crisis management in several ways, but its usefulness is context-dependent: Early detection: Identifies potential flashpoints and sentiment shifts. Effectiveness depends on data coverage and linguisti...
Post a Comment
Read more

From Signal to Substance: How Brands Orchestrate Purposeful Communication in Southeast Asia

-
Image
Purpose is not a statement. It is a sequence. Ignore that sequence and purpose collapses under scrutiny. In Southeast Asia’s hyper-connected markets, brands are no longer judged by what they say but by how structurally believable their communication is. Campaign-led purpose creates visibility. Trust is another matter. This article introduces Orchan Next --  a decision system shaped by regional advisory work -- designed to help leaders move from performative signalling to purposeful communication without triggering reputational backlash. Why Purpose Breaks Down Most purpose failures are not driven by bad intent. They stem from structural misalignment, and communication absorbs the damage first. Leadership wants to say the right thing. Teams want to move fast. Markets reward visibility. Culture rewards restraint. Operations lag behind, and communication bridges the gap, which can fracture especially in organisations where operational capacity or decision-making speed is constrained....
Post a Comment
Read more

Reputation in a Polarised World: Navigating Geopolitical Boycotts in Southeast Asia with Nuance

-
Image
Southeast Asia is a region full of contrasts. Cultures, religions, economies, and political viewpoints exist side by side. In this environment, global events often ripple through local markets in unpredictable ways. The recent consumer boycotts of Western fast‑food brands in Malaysia and Indonesia, driven by solidarity with Palestine, show how geopolitical sentiment can affect everyday brand choices. But the reality is rarely black and white. What began as social‑media calls in late 2023 led to real outcomes: some outlet closures, revenue pressure on brands like McDonald’s, KFC, and Starbucks, and faster growth for local alternatives. Yet geopolitics is only part of the story. Emotion, identity, economics, pricing, and post‑pandemic habits all play a role. A Human Story Within Larger Forces Take Lailatul Sarahjana Mohd Ismail*, a Malaysian mother who started frying chicken at home when her children craved fast food but familiar brands felt off-limits. That simple choice grew into Ahmad...
Post a Comment
Read more

Beyond Intent: Structural Reasons Brands Sound Fake Even When They’re Not

-
Image
Performative versus purposeful has become the dominant way we talk about brand communication in Southeast Asia. It is a useful provocation, but it only tells part of the story. Many communication failures don’t come from bad intent or cynical leadership. They emerge from misaligned systems, structural constraints, or uneven change. Brands can sound fake not because they are lying, but because their organisations aren’t set up to speak clearly. This isn’t a defence of performative PR. It’s a clear-eyed look at why it happens, when it can still serve a function, and why moralising oversimplifies the challenge. If you missed our first article in this series, Performative or Purposeful? Decoding Brand Communication in Southeast Asia , you can read it here: https://orchanpr.blogspot.com/2025/09/performative-or-purposeful-decoding.html The False Binary The performative–purposeful debate travels fast on LinkedIn. It signals values and sparks conversation. But in practice, it flattens reality....
Post a Comment
Read more

Silence Is Not Always Golden (Commentary by Farrell Tan)

-
Image
For years, silence has been treated as a kind of corporate virtue. Say nothing. Wait it out. Hope it passes. In theory, it sounds disciplined. In practice, it usually does the opposite of what brands intend. Silence is not neutral. It is interpreted. And in a real-time media environment, it is almost always interpreted badly. Why Brands Choose Silence Most decisions to stay quiet come from a reasonable place. Legal risk. Global sensitivities. Incomplete information. Fear of saying the wrong thing. In major M&A activity, restructuring, or crises, local communications teams often have limited room to move. Messages are cleared centrally. Words are scrutinised. Restraint is necessary. But somewhere along the way, restraint gets confused with disappearance. When nothing is said publicly, brands often tell themselves they are being careful. What they are really doing is outsourcing interpretation to everyone else. What Actually Happens When Brands Stay Silent Silence does not...
1 comment
Read more